The Bitcoin Layer

The Bitcoin Layer

Share this post

The Bitcoin Layer
The Bitcoin Layer
The Clock is Ticking: Bessent, US Treasury, and the Debt Dilemma - TBL Weekly #141

The Clock is Ticking: Bessent, US Treasury, and the Debt Dilemma - TBL Weekly #141

Augustine Carrasco's avatar
Nik Bhatia's avatar
Augustine Carrasco
and
Nik Bhatia
May 16, 2025
∙ Paid
19

Share this post

The Bitcoin Layer
The Bitcoin Layer
The Clock is Ticking: Bessent, US Treasury, and the Debt Dilemma - TBL Weekly #141
6
2
Share

Dear Readers,

As many of you already know, back in 2020, amidst the world coming to a complete halt, the US Treasury began shortening the maturity of the government’s debt. It did so by issuing an immense amount of short-term Treasury bills (which have a maturity of one year or less):

Values as of Thursday, May 15th, 2025

They did so during a time when interest rates were at all-time lows across the curve:

Values as of Thursday, May 15th, 2025

Unlike any other private entity, this somewhat goes against conventional debt management practices, which is to issue long-term debt when interest rates are low to lock in better rates, and issue short-term debt when interest rates are expected to decrease in order to lock in better refinancing rates later on (all this ignoring the ease with which an entity can issue short due to a liquidity premium, but more on this later).

So, what gives? Why does the US Treasury seem to act differently than a common debt manager? And most importantly, what’s behind their choices of debt issuance across different maturities? In this article, we go over:

  • The US Treasury’s debt management policies.

  • The never-ending debt ceiling debacle.

  • Where the US Treasury finds itself today.

So, without further ado, let’s dive into TBL Weekly #141.


Stop asking how to value bitcoin. Start asking how to value everything else in bitcoin.

A new report from Unchained and Strive shows why companies and investors should shift their lens—and start benchmarking performance in bitcoin.

Read The Report


❌ DON’T WRITE YOUR SEED ON PAPER 📝

It’s estimated that ~30% of Bitcoin is lost forever. Poor seed phrase security is a big reason why. This is why we use Stamp Seed, a DIY kit that enables you to hammer your seed words into a durable plate of titanium using professional stamping tools.

  • Heat-resistant to 3,000ºF, rust-proof, crush-proof, and time-proof

  • Compact and easy to hide

  • No loose parts, such as screws or letter tiles

Take 15% off with code: TBL.

Get Your Stamp Seed Today


Our videos are on major podcast platforms—take us with you on the go!
Apple Podcasts Spotify Fountain

Keep up with The Bitcoin Layer by following our social media!
YouTube X LinkedIn Instagram TikTok


Weekly Analysis

The Treasury’s Debt Management Job

Optimal (or theoretical) debt management policy by the US Treasury juggles a plethora of things. In the 2016 book, “The $13 Trillion Dollar Question: How America Manages Its Debt,” the authors argue that government debt management consists of three main objectives:

  1. First and foremost is the goal of obtaining the lowest financing cost for US taxpayers.

  2. Secondly, the first goal must be achieved without compromising or harming the future taxpayer.

  3. Thirdly, seeing as US Treasury yields are the risk-free rates of the world, you must manage the previous two goals while maintaining financial stability.

Needless to say, the shoes of a Treasury Secretary are hard to fill. Nevertheless, the job must get done, so let’s talk about each of these components.

One BIG CAVEAT before reading this article: The US Treasury’s mandate is not to time the market. What we review below comes mainly from a traditional debt-management lens, which is not what the US Treasury does. The US Treasury isn’t in the business of calling tops and bottoms in US rates markets.

Objective #1: Keeping the Cost of Financing Low

Generally speaking, the shorter the maturity of debt instruments, the more money-like the asset, meaning that shorter-term debt carries an inherent ‘liquidity premium.’ Given the ease with which one can transform these instruments into cash, this raises the price of short-term Treasuries, leading to lower risk and, therefore, lower yields. Accordingly, one could naively suggest that issuing at the front end of the curve is a no-brainer. However, two issues arise with such a suggestion.

Firstly, flooding the market with only T-Bills would completely erase this liquidity premium and force the Fed to step in and buy all this supply if they want to maintain their targets for overnight rates. Secondly, you effectively compromise the second objective of debt management policy mentioned above—that is, you expose the future taxpayer to an incredible amount of refinancing risk as these T-Bills mature, which leads us to the next part.

Objective #2: Reducing The Risk of Future High Taxes

As mentioned at the start of his article, in 2020, amidst the pandemic, the US Treasury issued loads of short-term debt. At pure face value, we can see why they would want to do that. Just look at this next chart, where we keep only short T-Bill rates:

Values as of Thursday, May 15th, 2025

At the time, the Federal Reserve brought interest rates down to near zero, which meant that financing at the short end of the curve cost almost nothing (ignoring future refinancing risks). However, the following years got a bit more interesting…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Nik Bhatia
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share